CLINICAL RESEARCH
Living with ostomy: a quality of life study
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2016-08-21
 
 
Final revision date: 2016-10-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-10-14
 
 
Publication date: 2016-10-25
 
 
Arch Med Sci Civil Dis 2016;1(1):106-111
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Temporary or permanent ostomy creation can sometimes be mandatory in a variety of urgent or elective situations. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the problems faced by patients with different types of intestinal stomas by using a stoma quality of life scale.
Material and methods: The quality of life (QoL) of 61 patients with an ostomy (colostomy, ileostomy) who underwent operation at our hospital was identified from our outpatient registry. A trained research nurse administered a questionnaire with socio-demographic variables including age, gender, area of residence, marital status, education and clinical variables including type of stoma, median years since surgery and underlying disease and a Stoma Quality of Life Scale. The scores based on the answers were calculated and statistical analysis was performed.
Results: The participants answered almost all questions apart from a few patients who preferred not to score sexuality/body image questions. People with a colostomy have significantly worse QoL scores due to skin irritation (p = 0.019). There is no statistically significant difference between patients with an ileostomy and a colostomy with respect to QoL scales apart from the financial impact controlling for age (p = 0.041). The younger patients had significantly less financial concern than older patients given their ostomy type. Multiple regression results indicate that skin irritation decreases significantly as ostomy time increases (p = 0.044). The life satisfaction of patients is considerably affected and has dropped significantly since last month (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Bearing in mind our limited patient data we can suggest that a stoma affects a patient’s QoL considerably and an ileostomy has a slight advantage for patients’ QoL in terms of skin irritation compared to the patients with a colostomy.
REFERENCES (13)
1.
Felce D. Defining and applying the concept of quality of life. J Intellect Disabil Res 1997; 41: 126-35.
 
2.
Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, et al. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 203-13.
 
3.
Klopp AL. Body image and self-concept among individuals with stomas. J Enterostomal Ther 1990; 17: 98-105.
 
4.
Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, et al. Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res 2007; 138: 79-87.
 
5.
Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 361-9.
 
6.
Baxter NN, Novotny PJ, Jacobson T, et al. A stoma quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 205-12.
 
7.
Kluka S, Kristjanson LJ. Development and testing of the ostomy concerns scale: measuring ostomy-related concerns of cancer patients and their partners. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1996; 23: 166-70.
 
8.
Olbrisch ME, Ziegler SW. Psychological adjustment and patient information in inflammatory bowel disease: development of two assessment instruments. J Chron Dis 1982; 35: 649-58.
 
9.
SjÖdahl R, Schulz C, Myrelid P, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with permanent sigmoid colostomy. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e335-8.
 
10.
Gooszen A, Geelkerken R, Hermans J, et al. Quality of life with a temporary stoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 650-5.
 
11.
Bekkers M, Van Knippenberg F, Van Den Borne H, et al. Prospective evaluation of psychosocial adaption to stoma surgery: the role of self-efficacy. Psychosom Med 1996; 58: 183-91.
 
12.
Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, et al. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1569-74.
 
13.
Decosse JJ. Quality of life. J Surg Oncol 1997; 65: 231.
 
ISSN:2451-0637
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top