CLINICAL RESEARCH
Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2016-10-31
Acceptance date: 2016-12-19
Publication date: 2016-12-29
Arch Med Sci Civil Dis 2016;1(1):126-130
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The aim of this study was to retrospectively review the surgical outcomes of laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, in order to evaluate the feasibility, utility, and functional outcomes of this procedure in patients with slow transit constipation.
Material and methods: The analysis included patients treated between January 2012 and January 2015. Slow transit constipation was diagnosed following a colonic transit test, anal manometry test, balloon expulsion test, and barium enema to exclude secondary causes. Patients deemed suitable underwent laparoscopically assisted total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. The main outcome measures included the operative time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, and complications.
Results: Ten female patients (mean age: 36.9 years) underwent laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation. The mean operative time was 133 min, while the mean length of the largest incision was 4.2 cm, and the mean estimated blood loss was 90 ml. The mean time to first flatus was 2.4 days, and the mean duration of hospital stay was 7.6 days. No conversion to laparotomy was noted (0%). Post-operative complications included one wound infection and one ileus. There was no mortality associated with the procedure, and 9 (90%) patients expressed excellent or good satisfaction regarding the outcomes.
Conclusions: Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is well tolerated, and careful patient selection results in excellent outcomes, with improvement in bowel function. Laparoscopic techniques may represent a safe and efficient option to manage slow transit constipation.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Lembo A, Camilleri M. Chronic constipation. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1360-8.
2.
Pfeifer J, Agachan F, Wexner SD. Surgery for constipation: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 444-60.
3.
Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome II process. Gut 1999; 45: II1-5.
4.
Lane WA. Remarks on the results of the operative treatment of chronic constipation. Br Med J 1908; 1: 126-30.
5.
Webster C, Dayton M. Results after colectomy for colonic inertia: a sixteen-year experience. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 639-44.
6.
Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Müller-Lissner SA. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999; 45: II43-7.
7.
Lu CL, Chang FY, Chen CY, Luo JC, Lee SD. Significance of Rome II-defined functional constipation in Taiwan and comparison with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 429-38.
8.
Bassotti G, Chiarioni G, Vantini I, et al. Anorectal manometric abnormalities and colonic propulsive impairment in patients with severe chronic idiopathic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39: 1558-64.
9.
Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Severe chronic constipation of young women: ‘idiopathic slow transit constipation’. Gut 1986; 27: 41-8.
10.
Knowles CH, Martin JE. Slow transit constipation: a model of human gut dysmotility. Review of possible aetiologies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2000; 12: 181-96.
11.
Bassotti G, Chiarioni G, Imbimbo BP, et al. Impaired colonic motor response to cholinergic stimulation in patients with severe chronic idiopathic (slow transit type) constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 1040-5.
12.
Zhao RH, Baig MK, Thaler KJ, et al. Reduced expression of serotonin receptor(s) in the left colon of patients with colonic inertia. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 81-6.
13.
Hotta T, Yamaue H. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000-2009. Surg Today 2011; 41: 1583-91.
14.
Hsiao KC, Jao W, Wu CC, Lee TY, Lai HJ, Kang JC. Hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy for slow transit constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 419-24.
15.
Thompson WG. Constipation: a physiological approach. Can J Gastroenterol 2000; 14 Suppl D: 155D-62D.
16.
Lahr SJ, Lahr CJ, Srinivasan A, Clerico ET, Limehouse VM, Serbezov IK. Operative management of severe constipation. Am Surg 1999; 65: 1117-21; discussion 1122-3.
17.
Ho YH, Tan M, Eu KW, Leong A, Choen FS. Laparoscopic-assisted compared with open total colectomy in treating slow transit constipation. Aust N Z J Surg 1997; 67: 562-5.
18.
Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 577-81.
19.
Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, et al. Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 37: S35-46.
20.
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Piqué J, et al. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 1101-5.
21.
Piccirillo MF, Reissman P, Wexner SD. Colectomy as treatment for constipation in selected patients. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 898-901.
22.
Wexner SD, Daniel N, Jagelman DG. Colectomy for constipation: physiologic investigation is the key to success. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 851-6.
23.
Pikarsky AJ, Efron J, Hamel CT, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Effect of age on the functional outcome of total abdominal colectomy for colonic inertia. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3: 318-22.
24.
Sample C, Gupta R, Bamehriz F, Anvari M. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for colonic inertia. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 803-8.
25.
Vergara-Fernandez O, Mejía-Ovalle R, Salgado-Nesme N, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients treated with laparoscopic total colectomy for colonic inertia. Surg Today 2014; 44: 34-8.
26.
FitzHarris GP, Garcia-Aguilar J, Parker SC, et al. Quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: both quality and quantity count. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 433-40.